There is no one right way to respond to the views the ACT provides you with. A few of this will depend on which viewpoint you are taking. By way of example, if we consented with attitude One, which takes a bad view regarding the ramifications of smart devices, i would desire to talk about both of one other two views (which both just take good views of smart devices) in one single paragraph, after which disagree using them within the next paragraph when I provide my help for attitude One.
Since i am arguing for attitude Three (devices challenge our some ideas as to what people are or could be, which pushes us and devices toward brand new opportunities), i will argue against attitude One and attitude Two individually, because i’ve strong proof for my analyses of every viewpoint. Continue reading